[Paper] Transparency and fact-checking in open societies
Transparency is seen as a means to achieve accountability and credibility in reporting and as a tool to hold public figures accountable. However, transparency does not protect Nordic fact-checkers from criticism or harassment for delivering uncomfortable truths. Transparency is not without flaws, even in societies characterised by a culture of openness… and transparency.
[Chapter] From bytes to bylines – A history of AI in journalism practices
This chapter is published as part of Histories of Digital Journalism (2024) and explores the historical development of artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism. Highlighting the ethical complexities and professional challenges associated with integrating AI into newsrooms, it underscores journalism’s ability to adapt and engage with evolving technologies.
From AI to foreign influence: How European fact-checkers are fighting disinformation
The first conference of the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) took place in Brussels, marking a significant milestone for European fact-checkers as they unite to tackle the rapidly evolving challenges of disinformation.
[Tutorial] Talking to journalists about AI
AI is testing the boundaries of human intelligence. AI will shape your soul. This AI really wants to know you. AI loves you. We still know little about how AI thinks. AI is racist and sexist. AI lies. AI does not want to be regulated. AI doesn’t care about you. AI cooks perfect steaks.
20 sets of tasks for using large language models (LLMs) in journalism
This list ilustrates the potential for using Large Language Models (LLMs) in journalism, and how they can be used under human supervision.
[Paper] Outsourcing, Augmenting, or Complicating: The Dynamics of AI in Fact-Checking Practices in the Nordics
Results show that while AI technologies offer valuable functionalities, fact-checkers remain critical and cautious, particularly toward AI, due to concerns about accuracy and reliability. Despite acknowledging the potential of AI to augment human expertise and streamline specific tasks, these concerns limit its wider use. AI and GAI-based solutions are framed as “enablers” rather than comprehensive or end-to-end solutions, recognizing their limitations in replacing or augmenting complex human cognitive skills.
[Paper] A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism
This paper aims to bridge the gap between machine learning development and journalism by focusing on three key areas: assessing the quality of machine learning datasets, guiding the development of machine learning solutions through a data-centric approach, and promoting AI and data literacy among journalists. It also examines the development of machine learning systems in newsrooms from the perspective of trustworthy AI, highlighting the need to reflect ethical journalism standards and their corollary, high data quality.
[Paper] Screens as Battlefields: Fact-Checkers’ Multidimensional Challenges in Debunking Russian-Ukrainian War Propaganda
This study examines the challenges fact-checkers face when dealing with war propaganda and how their socio-professional contexts influence these obstacles.
